带有现货市场的柔性合约决策与协调能力比较

计算机集成制造系统 ›› 2013, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (06 ): 1397-1407.

带有现货市场的柔性合约决策与协调能力比较

程永文^1,2,周永务¹

1.华南理工大学工商管理学院
2.合肥学院经济系

出版日期:2013-06-30 发布日期:2013-06-30
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70971041,71131003);教育部博士点基金资助项目(20100172110032);广东省自然科学基金资助项目(10151064101000000)。

Comparison of flexible contract decisions with coordination competence in spot market

Online:2013-06-30 Published:2013-06-30
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation,China(No.70971041,71131003),the Research Fund for the Doctoral Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education,China(No.20100172110032),and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province,China(No.10151064101000000).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决供应商和制造商柔性合约的最优化决策问题并分析不同合约供应链系统的协调能力,通过设定供应商和制造商两阶段运作的契约模型,分别对远期合约、期权合约和组合合约中供应商和制造商的分散最优决策进行求解,得出不同合约供应链系统利润函数。以集中供应链作为协调的参考基准,用数值方法比较了三类合约的系统利润,发现组合合约的系统利润接近集中决策系统,而单纯的远期合约或期权合约的协调能力远逊于组合合约。

关键词: 供应链, 协调合约, 远期合约, 期权合约, 组合合约, 最优决策

Abstract: To solve the optimal problems on flexible contracts decisions of supplier and manufacturer,and to analyze the coordination competence of different supply chain contracts,the decentralized optimal decision of supplier and manufacturer in forward contracts,option contracts and portfolio contracts was solved respectively by setting the contract model of supplier and manufacturer's two stage operation.The profit functions of different supply chain system were obtained.Based on the reference of centralized supply chain coordination,three types of contracts-system profit were compared by numerical method,and the results demonstrated that the system profit of portfolio contracts was closed to the centralized decision system,but the coordination competence of simple forward contracts or option contracts was much less than portfolio contracts.

Key words: supply chains, coordination contracts, forward contracts, option contracts, portfolio contracts, optimal decision

中图分类号:

F270.3

程永文,周永务. 带有现货市场的柔性合约决策与协调能力比较[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2013, 19(06 ): 1397-1407.

[1]	张念,李会鹏,蹇洁,苏加福. 价格折扣下后悔预期对供应链成员企业定价决策的影响[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(8): 2437-2447.
[2]	李绩才,刘燕飞,楼婷渊,李昌文,周永务. 带有网络直销的双渠道制造商供应链中的定价和广告决策[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(8): 2448-2460.
[3]	谭春桥,李波,周丽. 考虑企业社会责任的物流服务供应链定价决策[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(8): 2461-2475.
[4]	董景峰,高珊,高贵晨,杨若怡. 顾客感知价值和回收质量不确定下的闭环供应链定价决策[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(8): 2476-2490.
[5]	张雪梅,周根贵,曹柬. 考虑政府规制和供应链协调的再制造微分博弈模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(7): 2095-2111.
[6]	郭羽含,于俊宇,刘万军,张宇,张美琪. 制造业可持续供应链网络建模及求解[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(7): 2112-2133.
[7]	胡盛强,程硕,王新林. 考虑产出随机的采购策略选择与供应链协调[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(7): 2156-2170.
[8]	孙晋怡,周岩,曲箫宇. 考虑质量和延保服务的多产品供应链网络均衡[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(6): 1833-1842.
[9]	何丽娜,王国涛,刘珏. 基于犹豫模糊DEMATEL与风险屋的供应链风险管理[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(5): 1459-1468.
[10]	戚佛兰,周岩. 考虑渠道公平的双渠道二层供应链网络均衡策略[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(5): 1469-1482.
[11]	王忠伟,尹谦,庞燕,邢立宁,任腾. 再制造闭环供应链回收问题研究进展[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(4): 1201-1210.
[12]	蔡建湖,张玉洁,徐芳,黄卫来. 交货时间不确定环境下两级供应链库存决策与契约设计[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(4): 1211-1225.
[13]	谭乐平,宋平,杨琦峰. 风险规避下基于双向期权的供应链融资与协调[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(3): 912-923.
[14]	聂福海,李电生,肖婷婷. 考虑外源融资的资金约束供应链物流策略[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(3): 924-932.
[15]	蹇洁,郭雨,姜林,苏加福. 基于多目标优化的绿色供应链博弈模型及利润共享契约[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(3): 943-953.